|
I used to get upset at hearing jokes that I thought derided engineers and ridiculed engineering, seeing no way in which they could improve our self-respect or elevate our
profession. I was especially incensed when the jokes were reprinted in the organs of our professional societies--as if engineers should be happy to be acknowledged at all,
however tauntingly, and by anonymous comedians at that. In time, I began to lighten up. A good joke is a fair, if exaggerated, characterization of what we are, and we engineers should be secure enough to laugh at ourselves.
Distilling the essence of some group or the nature of some institution appears to be one quality of jokes that attracts us to them. We react with amusement to a spontaneous realization that we and the joke teller are communicating
in a knowing way. To laugh at a joke is to signal that we understand it and to some degree assent to the fundamental truth of what it says. We engineers, like members of all groups, do have distinguishing personality
traits. Defining and exploring those traits and characteristics can often be done more gently in jokes than in pronouncements, lectures, accusations, or
diatribes. Jokes have always been able to go where serious conversation dare not tread. A close look at some current engineer jokes--a good sampling of which can be found on any of the many Web sites
identified by, say, a Google search--is revealing and reassuring. Cutting as they may seem at first glance, many of these jokes are at heart more positive than negative about the profession and its practitioners.
One popular joke has a lawyer, a priest, and an engineer set to be beheaded. In one version, the lawyer's head is the first to be put on the block, and the guillotine lever is pulled. When the blade gets
stuck before it reaches her neck, she is released and walks away shouting that justice has been served. When the blade gets stuck a second time, before striking the priest's neck, he is released and
walks away praising a higher form of justice. As the engineer's head is placed on the block, he cranes his neck to look up at the malfunctioning machine and yells at the executioner, "Stop! I think I see the
problem."This joke can be read to be not about the overly engrossed engineer who doesn't even care about saving his own neck but about the engineer's propensity to try to fix everything he encounters.
Rather than devaluing engineering, the joke honors an overarching trait of the profession. Some of the best jokes are one-liners, such as: "Whenever two engineers gather there are three
opinions present." On the surface of it, this characterization might seem to describe indecisiveness, an undesirable quality. In fact, the joke can be read to fairly capture the nature of engineering, and a
common personality trait among engineers. We recognize that a design problem has no unique solution, and so to represent engineers as seeing any situation from different points of view is simply to recognize what we do.
Consider another one-liner: To the optimist, the glass is half full; to the pessimist, half empty; to the engineer, the container is twice as large as it needs to be. The engineer in this telling quip is neither
optimist nor pessimist, but an optimizer who sees an imperfect fit between form and function and views the question of contents and container in real, not abstract, terms. Rather than ridiculing engineers,
the joke praises us. Which of us is not at heart an optimizer? The engineer is characterized in many jokes as being naive, as being focused to a fault on the work at
hand, and as always making the best of the situation. These are not the kinds of indictments that, say, lawyers suffer in jokes about their profession. One engineer/lawyer joke now circulating has an engineer
in hell, for which he has designed air conditioning. When God declares the engineer's placement to be a mistake and threatens to sue to get the engineer reassigned where he belongs, Satan laughs, asking
God how he's ever going to find a lawyer in heaven. Many profession-comparing jokes are actually kinder to engineers than their counterparts, and this
suggests that our profession fares much better than others in the public mind. If we engineers are portrayed as nerds, we are painted as honest, hard-working, and likable ones. We may not be the
subject of anthologies of cartoons from the New Yorker, but neither are we the brunt of jokes as vicious as so many directed at lawyers are. We engineers are in the fortunate position of being liked by the
general public, if the messages contained in the jokes they tell are any measure. The criticism in the jokes is never cruel and bears being laughed at. And a good laugh now and then can help us to better
understand the humanity of our profession. Henry Petroski is the A.S. Vesic Professor of Civil Engineering and a professor of history at Duke University. He is the author of The Book on the Bookshelf
and other books on engineering and design.
|
|