|
|


The House Hearings on the August blackout that plunged
the northeast into darkness highlighted Congress's need for unbiased
analysis and interpretation of technical data. Testimony from power
company technicians and engineers was often contradictory and always
esoteric. And the blackout is a relatively small issue. Global warming,
Internet security, and airline safety promise to bring hordes of experts
and lobbyists to Congress for years to come.
Everybody and his brother has a proposal to deal
with these issues, M. Granger Morgan says. Morgan, head of the
department of engineering and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University,
adds that congressional members and their staffs have neither the time
nor technical expertise to analyze these proposals effectively.
Morgan, who has written extensively on the topic, recently
co-edited and contributed to a book on the issue of providing Congress
with unbiased technical analysis. Entitled Science and Technology Advice
for Congress, the book was given out to all members of Congress.
The problem, Morgan says, is twofold: The issues facing
Congress are becoming increasingly complex, and members, most of whom
have non-technical backgrounds, have few resources to sort through the
flood of information. The solution, he says, involves, among other things,
a bipartisan analysis agency serving Congress. I'm advocating
the creation of an institution that could provide the same service as
the old OTA [Office of Technology Assessment], Morgan says. The
OTA was a congressional agency that provided consultation on technical
issues for 23 years before mid-'90s cost-cutting measures killed
it. Morgan says this new agency should work more rapidly than OTA did,
better acknowledge the minority party viewpoint, and utilize interactive
Web-based technology. The ultimate goal, Morgan says, is to raise
the minimum standard of debate within Congress so everyone can participate.

Next time you're sipping on a particularly good glass
of wine, give a bit of thanks to soil moisture. The best grapes are
grown in earth that has the right amount of water. Too much water tends
to encourage leaf growth in vines, and berry ripening suffers. Too little
and the vines wither and die. So grape-growers are careful in irrigating
their crops. Technologies currently used for monitoring soil moisture
are expensive and not very exact. Now researchers led by the University
of California-Berkeley have devised a much more precise technology using
GPR, ground penetrating radar. The device, which has two antennas, is
dragged between rows of vines. One antenna shoots a radar beam into
the ground, the other retrieves the signal after it's gone through
several layers of soil. The time between the transmitted and reflected
signals can be used to determine moisture levels, says Yoram Rubin,
the Berkeley professor of civil and environmental engineering who is
the chief investigator. The instrument is off-the-shelf,
he says. It's the same sort of machine used to find metals, like
munitions or pipes, in the ground. We've added an interpretive
algorithm. Typically, a plot within a vineyard is watered uniformly.
But more precise moisture monitoring will require irrigation systems
that can water with pinpoint accuracy, Rubin says. The technology can
also be used to help vineyards space their vines and to locate ideal
areas for planting vines. The result should be more and better wines.
We'll drink to that.

When University of Alabama sophomore Brian Wheat graduates
with a degree in civil and environmental engineering, he ultimately
wants to work on large construction sites: buildings, bridges, or roads.
That should be a well-paying career. In the meantime, he's earning
a pretty good living on weekends as a professional bull rider in rodeos
throughout the southeast. Wheat, 21, says he's earned enough as
a bull rider to so far pay for three full years of tuition. He's
a member of the Southern Pro Bull Riders Association.
Wheat was a 17-year-old high school student when a buddy talked him
into trying it at a practice area. He was a latecomer. Many riders start
when they're 12 or 13. But I picked it up really quick. I
was a natural at it, he says. Indeed, Wheat was once one of the
top four high school riders in the state. Bull riders need to remain
on the back of a bucking, snorting bull for 8 seconds, and are then
awarded points. Wheat's best ride so far garnered 89 out of a possible
100 points. It's a dangerous sport, however. He's suffered
a dislocated shoulder, and in fall 2001 his face was sliced open when
it scraped across a bull's horn. That injury required major reconstructive
surgery. But, Wheat says, he wasn't scared to start riding again,
though he now wears a protective helmet. This year, he says, his injuries
have been few: Only three broken toes.

There is fast, and then there is fastlike a car
that travels faster than a passenger jet. That's what the designers
of the North American Eagle are aiming to achieve in late 2004 or early
2005. A joint U.S.-Canadian entry, the $10 million project will attempt
to reach a speed of 800 miles per hour, eclipsing the land speed record
of 763 miles per hourMach 1.02set in 1997. High speed requires
high power, and the Eagle's engine packs a whopping 39,000 horsepower,
gulping 10 gallons of jet fuel every second. The engine is actually
a J-79 General Electric engine that once powered an F-4 Phantom jet,
stripped down and completely refurbished by S&S Turbine Services
Ltd. of Fort St. John, British Columbia. Company owner Robin Sipe has
rebuilt more than 30 J-79 engines for projects like natural gas compression
and electrical generators. He points out that British Petroleum uses
the same engines on the North Slope in Alaska to pump sea water into
oil wells to force out the oil.
Sipe buys his engines from the Davis-Montham air base
in Tucson, a huge graveyard for old military planes. Prices for engines
from the defunct planes range from $800 to several hundred thousand
dollars. Compare that to the price of a new
J-79 engine$4.5 millionand you have a pretty good deal.
Sipe admits he spent two months working on the engine, stripping it
down to nuts and bolts and recoating all critical parts with a ceramic
thermal covering that allows the engine to operate at higher temperatures.
The refitting increases the engine's power from 17,800 pounds thrust
to 20,000 pounds. It all adds up to a car, doesn't it? Or is it
a plane?

Leo L Beranek, a retired engineer and an authority
on acoustics, was one of eight leading scientists and engineers to receive
a 2002 National Medal of Science. The awards were presented by President
George Bush in a White House ceremony last October. The award honors
top researchers who have accomplished ground-breaking achievements in
science and engineering. The 2002 honorees are: Engineering: Baranek,
who designed new communications and noise reduction systems for World
War II aircraft. Moreover, his 1962 book, Music Acoustics and Architecture,
has long been considered the field's definitive text. Chemistry:
John I. Brauman, Stanford University; Biology: James E. Darnell,
Rockefeller University; Mathematics: James G. Flimm, Stony Brook
University; Physical Sciences: W. Jason Morgan, Princeton University.
The National Medal of Techology laureates were also honored.
They are: Calvin H. Carter Jr., of Cree Inc.; Haren S. Gandhi,
Ford Motor Co.; Carver A. Meand, California Institute of Technology;
John J. Mooney and Carl D. Keith, Engelhard Corp; Nick
Holonyak Jr., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; M. George
Craford, LumiLeds Lighting; and Russell Dean
Dupuis, Georgia Tech; and DuPont.
http://www.nationalmedals.org

BUILDING ONE OF the world's fastest supercomputers
using readily available components, and on a budget of $5.2 million,
is an amazing achievement. But doing it within a three-week period is
nothing short of phenomenal. Yet faculty and students at Virginia Tech's
school of engineering accomplished both feats late last year. Using
1,100, 64-bit Apple Macintosh computers, the team's cobbled-together
cluster was certified as reaching a speed of 10.28 teraflops (one teraflop
equals a trillion operations a second), a velocity surpassed by only
two other supercomputers. It's also the first academic computer
to break through the 10 teraflop barrier, says Hassan Aref, the
school's dean. The school approached Apple last June, shortly after
the company introduced a new desktop, the G5 Power Mac. Apples don't
come cheap, but the company gives academic purchasers a discount, and
that made them affordable. The Virginia Tech cluster uses Apple's
Mac OS X operating system; most supercomputers run on Linux or Unix
systems.
The low-cost triumph is sure to shake things up in the
land of ultra-speedy computing. Most supercomputers take years to manufacture
and cost between $100 million to $250 million. Even other cluster machines
tend to cost much more. The one at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories,
which has a speed of 7.63 teraflops, cost an estimated $10 million to
$15 million to construct. Virginia Tech's group worked long hours
to get the job done quickly. Student volunteers were fueled by free
pizza. The job would have been completed even more rapidly if the sun
hadn't interfered. Eighteen of the Macs were temporarily knocked
out when a geomagnetic storm caused by a massive solar flare bombarded
Earth last October.

AUSTRALIAFreedom versus privacy? An engineer's
analysis suggests that when it comes to cell phones there's a trade-off
between the two. Rodney Kennedy, head of telecommunications engineering
at the Australian National University's research school of information
sciences and engineering, has been looking into just how minute these
devices may eventually become. The professor says, If we continue
the trend of better, faster, cheaper, smaller, we can assume cellular
telephones will soon be as powerful as today's desktop computers
but require so little power that the battery will never need recharging.
But all this comes at a price. A situation he raised in
a recent paper: You attempt to enter a store but it denies you access
because it has detected through your cell phone that you're a credit
risk. Or you're walking past a department store and your cell phone
rings. It's the store offering you discounted underwear because
it knows your raggedy pair is ready for the trash. They discovered its
shabby state from a message sent by a tiny RF-ID (radio frequency identification)
chip sewn into the seam of your undergarment alerting the store to its
history.
Soon, we'll be tracked by what we are wearing, eating,
and carrying. There are many challenges looming to ensure privacy is
respected, Kennedy says, adding that researchers will be increasingly
focusing on these issues.

THE FILM THAT Hollywood hunk Ben Affleck is hoping will
reignite his career has the actor playing . . . an engineer. An electrical
engineer, to be precise. In Paycheck, his character, Jennings,
is a reverse-engineer, which means he's hired by companies
to take apart the technologies of rivals to see how they work. After
he completes one job, the last two years of his memory are erased. He
awakens one morning confused and under investigation by the police.
His love interest is played by Uma Thurman. Yep, sounds like a typical
day in the life of a typical engineer. Affleck probably wouldn't
mind having his last film wiped from the movie-going public's collective
memory. He'd probably like to forget it himself. Gigli,
which he made with on-again/off-again fiancé Jennifer Lopez,
is considered one of the biggest critical and commercial flops of all
time. And another film, Jersey Girl, which was supposed to follow
Gigli into theatersand also co-stars J. Lohad its release
placed on hold. Indeed, Affleck is lately noted more for his romancing
of Lopez than for delivering hit movies. So he could use a career boost.
And perhaps his turn as an engineer will do the trick. If Paycheck
scores big, who knows? Maybe it'll have producers looking to bring
more stories about engineers to the silver screen. Then again, Revenge
of the Nerds has already been done.

The earlier a disease can be spotted, usually the greater
chance it can be treated. Now a multidisciplinary team of researchers
at London's Imperial Collegewhose ranks include engineers,
physicists, and physiciansare working on a technique that employs
superfast lasers to diagnose disease before it happens.
Once it's perfected, the Fluoresence-Lifetime Imaging (FLIM) technology
would spot molecular changes in cells that are a precursor to disease.
An incredibly short pulse of laser light lasting a picosecond, a billionth
of a second, is blasted at a bit of tissue. Molecules absorb that light
and, a picosecond later, respond by emitting a short-lived fluorescence
at a different wavelength. How long each molecule's fluorescence
lasts may yield information about the health of that tissue. According
to Paul M.W. French, team leader and professor of physics, molecules
in unhealthy tissue may fluoresce differently from those in healthy
tissue, and FLIM may be able to pick up those differences. Researchers,
however, are still trying to establish how long the flash of molecular
light should last when it's emitted by normal tissue cells. Once
that's known, anomalies in fluorescence length may indicate unhealthy
tissues, or molecular changes that could lead to disease. The molecular
fluorescence can be visualized as a color display. In a sense,
French says, it means time is color. FLIM could one day
do away with the need to take biopsies and treat tissue samples with
dye solutions for testing in a lab. The researchers are still determining
which diseases may be most easily diagnosed with FLIM.
Currently they're looking at arthritis and atherosclerotic
plaque, as well as cancer. Researchers envision miniaturizing the device
so it can be used in operating theaters for on-the-spot diagnosis of
tissue health. It could, for instance, be mounted on a conventional
endoscope. Indeed, such a device may be ready for clinical trials within
a year.
|