AUSTRALIA--A slump in the number of university students studying basic sciences worries some science
department deans. "Budgets are based on enrollments so deans are understandably concerned about being cash-strapped," says Ian Dobson, associate to the deputy vice-chancellor at Melbourne's prestigious Monash University. With Angel Calderon, the university's statistical services manager, Dobson conducted a national study and the findings confirmed the administrators' fears. While the overall number of science students is up significantly, the number studying within science
departments don't reflect this growth.
The reason: students are steering clear of traditional disciplines such as physics, chemistry, geology and mathematics--opting instead to major in computer science, biological science and psychology among others.
What's wrong with that? In Australia, explains Dobson, "many of these 'newer' courses are taught outside science departments. Psychology sometimes comes under the arts, biological science can often be found in medical schools, and the
fast-growing computer science discipline is likely to be based in the business school or in its own department. The traditional science faculty are seeing less of these students and budgets are shrinking."
He found that between 1989 and 1997 science enrollments at Australian universities grew from 60,700 to 95,800 students. While behavioral and biological science numbers surged 92 and 78 percent respectively, physics enrollments dropped two percent and mathematics tumbled five percent.
"They're not huge drops," says Dobson. "Overall, the number of students studying science has grown hugely--but you wouldn't guess it from looking at science faculties."
A consequence has been severe financial constraints within science departments, which has prompted cutbacks in academic staffing. Some fear there will be an erosion in the support base for future innovation growth areas of research, such as biotechnology.
So far, there has been no research
into the causes of the shift. Dobson suspects an explosion of female enrollments is a factor "with women more attracted to 'caring' sciences such as psychology or environmental sciences."
Nor are any solutions forthcoming. However, Dobson observes, "it's commonly said that the government should be investing more to encourage careers built around physics and chemistry."
--Chris Pritchard